9/11: An In-Depth Study, No Conclusive Evidence Of Airplanes

Created on Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:16

This article contains links to a number of documentaries that analyze the main stream media's broadcasts on 9/11/2001. (the links will be provided further down in the article)

The above mentioned documentaries purport that elements from the highest levels in the main stream media, may have actively participated in the 9/11 false-flag operation since, when studied in-dept and in slow motion, NONE of the footage that was broadcast live on 9/11 shows conclusive evidence of actual, physical airplanes.

I researched this subject extensively since I know that buildings cannot swallow airplanes which, according to all the news footage on that dayalso happened on September 11th.

Basic high school physics dictates that the planes could not punch through the facades of the Twin Towers, leaving cartoon-like plane shaped holes in the steel framework – and without any deflection, crumpling or deceleration! Watch the clips in the playlist below.

As you can see the plane actually disappears into the building AFTER which there is an explosion. Even if you only have an elementary understanding of physics, you should know that this just doesn't happen with real objects.

If the planes had been real they would have exploded up against the side of the building, not punch through one side and out the other.

I fully understand that the concept of projected/computer generated airplanes can be extremely hard to believe so check it out for yourself. If you have a 9/11 DVD at home that shows the second plane hitting the building, take it out and play it in slow motion (or pause/play alternately). If you don't have a DVD at home just find/download a video on the internet of the second plane hitting the building and you can do the same.

This is how NASA explains it to kids:

Newton's Third Law of Motion – When an object is pushed in one direction, there is always a resistance of the same size in the opposite direction. Click here to visit the page.

A simple experiment: take a toy plane, or any physical object for that matter, and -without hurting yourself of course- slam it into a wall as hard as you can. Does the plane/object disappear into the wall?? NO, it doesn't. If the rails of a high speed train are directed to make the train run into a steel and concrete wall, will the train disappear into the wall? NO, it won't.

To further prove my point:

This is the "crash site" of flight United 93 on 9/11/2001. WHERE IS THE PLANE DEBRIS?

This is a picture of the Pentagon lawn on 9/11/2001, in the area where American Airlines flight 77 supposedly hit the building. WHERE IS THE PLANE DEBRIS?

Watch this live commentary from CNN's senior correspondent at the Pentagon on 9/11/'01:

No Evidence of A Plane At The Pentagon – Part 1

By comparison

The crash site of flight Pan Am 103 that went down in Lockerbie on December 21st, 1988.

The crash site of American Airlines 1420 that overran the runway and crashed in Little Rock National Airport on June 1st, 1999.

The crash site of Malaysian Airlines MH17 which was shot down over the Ukraine on July 17th, 2014.

On October 7th, 2012 Discovery Channel aired an episode of ‘Curiosity’, in which a Boeing 727 was deliberately crash-landed in a remote and uninhabited Mexican desert as part of a scientific experiment.

This is what happens when a REAL plane crashes.

Click here to watch the full documentary.

These are some of the pictures of the Discovery Channel experiment. Notice the debris.

Sourcediscovery.com

 

Analyses of the mainstream media coverage on 9/11/2001:

9/11 In Plane Sight (The Pentagon Part)

No evidence of a plane in Pennsylvania

9/11: Continuous Pieces

September Clues

And then there is World Trade Center 7 which was NOT hit by an airplane, NOT a blazing fireball, but it nevertheless collapsed in it's own footprint on the afternoon of September 11th, 2001. This is one of the videos made by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Solving The Mystery of WTC 7.

As the saying goes: I rest my case and I challenge the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, to prove the fact that no planes were used on 9/11/2001 wrong. Based on the evidence to date (for example reports from first responders and footage shot on 9/11/2001) it looks like holographic projections were used to simulate the airplanes, but the buildings were actually destroyed by using a missile or missiles (Pentagon) and controlled demolitions (World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7).

No planes means no terrorist attack ('terrorist attack' is still the official explanation of the US government), which means that the events that took place on 9/11/2001 were executed from within the United States with a -for lack of a better term- demonic level of deception.

Much like Hitler and the Reichstag fire which was also a false flag operation.

Related Article: 10 Signs Of A False Flag Operation

The Nazi ideology is continued in the plans for The New World Order and this is some recommended viewing if you want to understand what the New World Order means:

Killuminati

Invisible Empire: The New World Order Defined

The New World Order's Orwellian Plan For Your Future a.k.a Agenda 21

And with all this I haven't even discussed the more esoteric, ritualistic aspects of the 9/11 deception yet.

If it is difficult for you to believe that the global main stream media is taking part in the cover-up of the truth about what actually happened on 9/11, I challenge you to do the following:

Call or send an email to your favorite main stream/national television station (doesn’t matter in which country you live) and ask them to broadcast any one of the many documentaries (Loose Change, Continuous Pieces, September Clues (2008), etc., etc.) that go against the official story of 9/11.

They will not be broadcast. I guarantee.

Then ask yourself, WHY? 

The answer is self-evident.

(Non-)Actions speak louder than words.

Stop watching television and think for yourself.

     

 

What you have to understand is that as the "terrorist attack" was a lie, this entire list and much, much more is based on lies too :

*** Al Qaeda***

Watch this documentary: Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist

*** Guantanamo Bay***

*** TSA***

The formation of the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and extremely invasive airport screening. (for example Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) equipment which uses either backscatter X-ray or millimeter-wave technology to provide a graphic image of a passenger's body beneath clothing)

 

 

*** The U.S. Department of Homeland Security***

 

*** The Patriot Act***

 

*** War in Afghanistan***

 

*** War in Iraq***

 

*** ISIS/ISIL***

ISIS: Made in the USA

The Rise Of Isis Is Part Of The West's Pipeline Geopolitics

 

*** War in Syria***

 

…..And the list goes on and on and on

Here is a list of organizations and people who also question the offical 9/11 story based on their expertise – and plain old common sense:

Pilots For 9/11 Truth

Commissioned and Non-commissioned U.S. Military Officers For 9/11 Truth

Lawyers For 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth

Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice

Actors & Artists For 9/11 Truth

Re-Think 9/11

When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing

By William M. Arkin
Special to washingtonpost.com 
Monday, Feb. 1, 1999

"Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government." So begins a statement being delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner, former Commander-in-chief, U.S. Special Operations Command.

At least the voice sounds amazingly like him. But it is not Steiner.

It is the result of voice "morphing" technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of Steiner's voice, scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns and develop an accurate facsimile. Steiner was so impressed, he asked for a copy of the tape.

Steiner was hardly the first or last victim to be spoofed by Papcun's team members. To refine their method, they took various high quality recordings of generals and experimented with creating fake statements. One of the most memorable is Colin Powell stating "I am being treated well by my captors."

"They chose to have him say something he would never otherwise have said," chuckled one of Papcun's colleagues.

A Box Of Chocolates Is Like War


Most Americans were introduced to the tricks of the digital age in the movie Forrest Gump, when the character played by Tom Hanks appeared to shake hands with President Kennedy.

For Hollywood, it is special effects. For covert operators in the U.S. military and intelligence agencies, it is a weapon of the future.

"Once you can take any kind of information and reduce it into ones and zeros, you can do some pretty interesting things," says Daniel T. Kuehl, chairman of the Information Operations department of the National Defense University in Washington, the military's school for information warfare.

PSYOPS seeks to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations.

Digital morphing — voice, video, and photo — has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives.

To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or coup.

 

Allah On The Holodeck


Pentagon planners started to discuss digital morphing after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Covert operators kicked around the idea of creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam Hussein crying or showing other such manly weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world.

The tape war never proceeded, killed, participants say, by bureaucratic fights over jurisdiction, skepticism over the technology, and concerns raised by Arab coalition partners.

What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad?
 

But the "strategic" PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam, a senior Air Force officer asked in 1990?

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

But doing so over the skies of Iraq? To project such a hologram over Baghdad on the order of several hundred feet, they calculated, would take a mirror more than a mile square in space, as well as huge projectors and power sources.

And besides, investigators came back, what does Allah look like?

The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The "Holographic Projector" is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to "project information power from space … for special operations deception missions."

War Is Like A Box Of Chocolates


Voice-morphing? Fake video? Holographic projection? They sound more like Mission Impossible and Star Trek gimmicks than weapons. Yet for each, there are corresponding and growing research efforts as the technologies improve and offensive information warfare expands.

Whereas early voice morphing required cutting and pasting speech to put letters or words together to make a composite, Papcun's software developed at Los Alamos can far more accurately replicate the way one actually speaks. Eliminated are the robotic intonations.

The irony is that after Papcun finished his speech cloning research, there were no takers in the military. Luckily for him, Hollywood is interested: The promise of creating a virtual Clark Gable is mightier than the sword.

Video and photo manipulation has already raised profound questions of authenticity for the journalistic world. With audio joining the mix, it is not only journalists but also privacy advocates and the conspiracy-minded who will no doubt ponder the worrisome mischief that lurks in the not too distant future.

"We already know that seeing isn't necessarily believing," says Dan Kuehl, "now I guess hearing isn't either."


William M. Arkin, author of "The U.S. Military Online," is a leading expert on national security and the Internet. He lectures and writes on nuclear weapons, military matters and information warfare. An Army intelligence analyst from 1974-1978, Arkin currently consults for Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, MSNBC and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Source: washingtonpost.com

A playlist to further illustrate the points that are made in this article

Links to the articles that are mentioned in the last video in this playlist can be found here

And to conclude this article, the Biggest Hologrammed PSYOP to date: 9/11: An In-Depth Study, No Conclusive Evidence Of Airplanes

No Evidence Of A Plane At The Pentagon (Part 1)

Created on Thursday, 03 June 2010 13:00

Jamie McIntyre is a former senior Pentagon correspondent for CNN. He was at the Pentagon on September 11th when the “plane” supposedly hit the building.

This is Jamie McIntyre’s   LIVE FEED  from the Pentagon on that day. Please note that the anchor woman mentions that he got very close to where that "plane" went down.

In this original report McIntryre clearly states "….from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." […]  "There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon."

You should know that “for some reason” he changed his report afterwards and said that not only did he see a plane but he also took pictures.

Ludicrous.

No Evidence Of A Plane At The Pentagon (Part 2)

Created on Thursday, 03 June 2010 13:30