“Bush Doctrine” And Never Ending “War On Terror” Supported By Every Single Political Candidate

Update April 9th, 2016, Documentary added to playlist – 'Donald Trump: Make America Hate Again'

Lives In The Balance Lyrics

Millions of Americans are tuning in this election cycle, to watch the politicians debate about how they will oppress us just a little bit less than the next guy. The candidates may seem to disagree on some issues, but when it comes to war, all of them are in agreement. Every candidate has promised to continue the wars that were started in the Bush and Obama eras, and they all refuse to even question the very premise of these conflicts, the “Bush Doctrine” and the “War on Terror”. After 9/11, the Bush administration put forward a philosophy of pre-emptive war that has infected American politics ever since and kept the country in a constant state of war.

The “War on Terror” was basically an excuse for the US government to go to war whenever and wherever they wanted to, and both the mainstream media and the American public have accepted this mentality ever since. When Obama became president, the anti-war left disappeared and began to support the war on terror mentality that they fought so hard against during the Bush years. In the years since the war on terror began, the US and NATO have created a total disaster in the Middle East, destroying the infrastructure of entire countries and funding opposing sides in civil wars and other conflicts. The further violence that this has created has provided the US military with even more justifications to create even more war, all in the name of “fighting terror”. During their pillage of Afghanistan and Iraq, the US government funneled billions of dollars worth of and weapons and support towards rebel groups in those and other countries, to destabilize governments in the areas that were not friendly with the US and help them install puppet dictatorships.

These plans backfired when the rebel groups turned on the US military, because after all, they are an occupying enemy. The rebel groups then began to assemble and form their own alliances, eventually becoming the terrorist group known as ISIS. Even after these rebel groups showed that they would not be able to be controlled and that they were terrorizing local areas, the US government continued to give them money and weapons, in hopes that they would destabilize the established governments, and provide an excuse for more conquest in the region. Sadly, this is an excuse that all the major presidential candidates have accepted. Even Bernie Sanders and Rand Paul, who are the favorite candidates of activists on either side of the aisle, are both supporters of the war on terror. Paul has said that he wants to declare war on ISIS, and Sanders has recently promised to continue the drone war overseas. Sanders has also consistently voted to give military funding to both Saudi Arabia and Israel and has voted to continue the wars overseas on multiple occasions. Both candidates continue to perpetuate the scare of the “War on Terror”, both have also called for the prosecution of Edward Snowden and the mainstream candidates like Trump and Clinton are even worse.

When Obama was campaigning he promised to end the wars but then just ended up lying about it. This time around the candidates aren’t even lying, they are just openly parroting the Bush doctrine and fearmongering about ISIS as a justification for war. It is not the job of the US government to police the world, and everywhere they have gone, they have made the situation worse and done whatever they could to benefit themselves and their allied corporations.

Edited from: trueactivist.com  

 

The Truth About The Lies  

Playlist Content

1. The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Behind The Smoke Curtain 

2. Uncovered: The Whole Truth About The Iraq War

3. Killuminati

4. Meet The Clintons

5. Donald Trump: Make America Hate Again 

6. Invisible Empire: The New World Order Defined

When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing

By William M. Arkin
Special to washingtonpost.com 
Monday, Feb. 1, 1999

"Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government." So begins a statement being delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner, former Commander-in-chief, U.S. Special Operations Command.

At least the voice sounds amazingly like him. But it is not Steiner.

It is the result of voice "morphing" technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of Steiner's voice, scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns and develop an accurate facsimile. Steiner was so impressed, he asked for a copy of the tape.

Steiner was hardly the first or last victim to be spoofed by Papcun's team members. To refine their method, they took various high quality recordings of generals and experimented with creating fake statements. One of the most memorable is Colin Powell stating "I am being treated well by my captors."

"They chose to have him say something he would never otherwise have said," chuckled one of Papcun's colleagues.

A Box Of Chocolates Is Like War


Most Americans were introduced to the tricks of the digital age in the movie Forrest Gump, when the character played by Tom Hanks appeared to shake hands with President Kennedy.

For Hollywood, it is special effects. For covert operators in the U.S. military and intelligence agencies, it is a weapon of the future.

"Once you can take any kind of information and reduce it into ones and zeros, you can do some pretty interesting things," says Daniel T. Kuehl, chairman of the Information Operations department of the National Defense University in Washington, the military's school for information warfare.

PSYOPS seeks to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations.

Digital morphing — voice, video, and photo — has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives.

To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or coup.

 

Allah On The Holodeck


Pentagon planners started to discuss digital morphing after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Covert operators kicked around the idea of creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam Hussein crying or showing other such manly weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world.

The tape war never proceeded, killed, participants say, by bureaucratic fights over jurisdiction, skepticism over the technology, and concerns raised by Arab coalition partners.

What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad?
 

But the "strategic" PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam, a senior Air Force officer asked in 1990?

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

But doing so over the skies of Iraq? To project such a hologram over Baghdad on the order of several hundred feet, they calculated, would take a mirror more than a mile square in space, as well as huge projectors and power sources.

And besides, investigators came back, what does Allah look like?

The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The "Holographic Projector" is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to "project information power from space … for special operations deception missions."

War Is Like A Box Of Chocolates


Voice-morphing? Fake video? Holographic projection? They sound more like Mission Impossible and Star Trek gimmicks than weapons. Yet for each, there are corresponding and growing research efforts as the technologies improve and offensive information warfare expands.

Whereas early voice morphing required cutting and pasting speech to put letters or words together to make a composite, Papcun's software developed at Los Alamos can far more accurately replicate the way one actually speaks. Eliminated are the robotic intonations.

The irony is that after Papcun finished his speech cloning research, there were no takers in the military. Luckily for him, Hollywood is interested: The promise of creating a virtual Clark Gable is mightier than the sword.

Video and photo manipulation has already raised profound questions of authenticity for the journalistic world. With audio joining the mix, it is not only journalists but also privacy advocates and the conspiracy-minded who will no doubt ponder the worrisome mischief that lurks in the not too distant future.

"We already know that seeing isn't necessarily believing," says Dan Kuehl, "now I guess hearing isn't either."


William M. Arkin, author of "The U.S. Military Online," is a leading expert on national security and the Internet. He lectures and writes on nuclear weapons, military matters and information warfare. An Army intelligence analyst from 1974-1978, Arkin currently consults for Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, MSNBC and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Source: washingtonpost.com

 

A playlist to further illustrate the points that are made in this article

Links to the articles that are mentioned in the last video in this playlist can be found here

And to conclude this article, the Biggest Hologrammed PSYOP to date: 9/11: An In-Depth Study, No Conclusive Evidence Of Airplanes

 

Dr. Len Horowitz: The True Origin of Aids, Ebola And Other Viruses

Created on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 22:53

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is an internationally known authority in public health, emerging diseases and natural healing.

Author of more than sixteen books, he is globally known for his controversial criticism of vaccinations and the miltary-medical-petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel. He holds three doctorates and two masters degrees, including one from Tufts University School of Dental Medicine and one from Harvard University School of Public Health, respectively.

In 1999 he was voted ” Author of the Year” by the World Natural Health Organization, for his first of three national bestsellers, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional.

In this presentation (1997) Dr. Len Horowitz explains how the AIDS and Ebola viruses were engineered and why the accompanying and various other vaccinations are also man-made tools for neo-genocidal eugenics and profiteering.

I don’t subscribe to Dr. Horowitz’s religious beliefs (or any other religious beliefs for that matter), but his scientific research is sound.

Highly recommended viewing.


Related

10 Signs Of A False Flag Operation

Ebola: False Flag Vaccination Blackmail

Ebola Is the Most Dangerous False Flag Event In History

The New World Order's Orwellian Plan For Your Future a.k.a Agenda 21 

Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS

Project Camelot Interviews Jane Burgermeister About The Avian Flu

We Become Silent – The Last Days Of Health Freedom

Codex Alimentarius

Max Igan & Ken O’Keefe – False Flags And The American Interest

Posted on the front page in April 2014

Max Igan and Ken O'Keefe's breakdown on Israeli lobbyist Patrick Clawson's suggestion, to use a false flag event as a means of initiating conflict with Iran.

Max Igan's website: The Crowhouse