Global Research posted an article with the opinions of 12 top-level experts on the coronavirus outbreak, which contradict the official government narratives that are broadcast on the mainstream media 24/7. You can read the full article on their website, but I'm putting the most informative quotes, which are from an interview with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, in this post.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.
What he says:
We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realize that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.
Imagine a virus, the most terrifying virus you can imagine, and then imagine that you and you alone have the cure.
But if your ultimate goal is power, how best to use such a weapon?
Watch this clip from the movie V for Vendetta. Truth really is stranger than fiction.
What will the World Disease Organization think of next? Hmmm, let me see, so first it was wash your hands well, keep your distance blabla, now it's don't shake hands at all, so next it will probably be don't have intercourse ever again in case the Corona Virus is sexually transmitted and the final step is don't breathe at all!!
Watch and listen carefully to what is being explained.
Quote from this video
The first order of business for a propagandist or an advertiser is to create the circumstances, that will induce the state of mind that is favorable to the reception of their message. And that state of mind is the hypnotic state of mind, making television extremely important in this whole process of creating a unified mindset among the entire population.
This clip needs no introduction as it really speaks for itself, but this is a quote from David Icke in this video:
"We are in a county and in a world, that is being run by unbelievably sick people. The chasm between what we are told is going on, and what is really going on, is absolutely enormous."
5. 9/11: The Perfect Example of FAKERY on TV and other News Outlets
Watch the 2 documentaries below if you want a better understanding of how images on news outlets, especially television reporting, can be and are faked.
You don't need a 160 IQ to analyze the images, just use your common sense.
Editor's update: By now (Monday evening, March 9th) the whole of Italy is on lockdown, which is a real bummer because I was so looking forward to having tea with the Pope this Sunday – NOT
Clearly the end of the Corona insanity is nowhere in sight. Let's put every country on the globe on lockdown and then see what happens. Will chimpanzees take over the world?….
Quote from this article:
The effect does not prove the cause. It never did. It never will. Aristotle figured this out 2300 years ago.
Meanwhile, governments are willy-nilly making drastic decisions that profoundly affect the status of human freedom. Their decisions are going to affect our lives in profound ways. And there has thus far been no real debate on this. It’s just been presumed that containment of the spread rather than the care of the sick is the only way forward.
What’s more, we have governments all-too-willing to deploy their awesome powers to control human populations in direct response to mass public pressure based on fears that have so far not been justified by any available evidence. For this reason, we have every reason to be concerned.
Are we really ready to imprison the world, wreck financial markets, destroy countless jobs, and massively disrupt life as we know it, all to forestall some uncertain fate, even as we do know the right way to deal with the problem from a medical point of view? It’s at least worth debating.
TFTP (thefreethoughtproject) has spoken with a source in China who says that thousands of people are dying from the lockdown — not because they have the coronavirus — but because they are unable to leave their homes to receive treatment for curable diseases. To stop the spread of the coronavirus, Chinese officials have reportedly condemned thousands of other sick folks to death.
No one here is claiming that we shouldn’t have some level of concern when it comes to coronavirus which as of Monday morning has [insert: supposedly] infected over 111,000 people, killing over 3,800 worldwide. However, all of these police state measures raise an extremely important question that society must start to consider right now. Is the cure worse than the disease?
Presumably the federal quarantine law and the implementing regulations and executive orders fall within the power of Congress to regulate foreign and interstate commerce, although some recent statements by the Supreme Court’s conservative Justices call even that authority into question.
The civil confinement cases might therefore suggest that attempts to confine people because they are infected with a contagious disease should also be tested by the clear-and-convincing evidence standard. But as various academic articles note, that approach would be unworkable. If even one in a thousand people is likely to pose a risk of infecting the general public with a highly contagious deadly disease, then the government should be able to quarantine all one thousand, even though the probability that any one of them is infected is far below even a preponderance, much less clear and convincing evidence.
It does not follow, however, that government officials should be permitted to issue quarantine orders without any judicial oversight. A person subject to quarantine—or given the numbers that could be involved, a class action representative suing on behalf of many people subject to quarantine—should be permitted to challenge the quarantine itself.
Public health officials appear to disagree about the efficacy of quarantine measures. Accordingly, a plaintiff’s mere invocation of that disagreement should not be enough to secure the judicial invalidation of a quarantine. Otherwise, the government could never implement a quarantine.
At the same time, however, quarantine amounts to an extraordinarily serious limitation on liberty. Moreover, even a quarantine that is justified for purposes of preventing the spread of a disease to the general population can put the individuals subject to the quarantine at greater risk of becoming sick themselves—by concentrating them among others with a higher risk of being infected.
Accordingly, judicial review of government officials’ claims that a quarantine is necessary to protect public health should not be a mere rubber stamp
12. Medical Martial Law
Remember Swine Flu? The Corona Virus crisis is a crisis that has been in the making for decades. An excellent report by James Corbett in the video below.
If you want to be able to separate fact from fiction with regard to the ever-changing stories and explanations about the Corona Virus, I highly recommend that you read the articles written on the websites of these two investigative journalists:
According to one of the latest official reportsyou can spread the coronavirus, EVEN if you don't have any symptoms, i.e. you have the coronavirus even if you don't have the coronavirus.
That's insane.
The video below is highly recommended viewing, but again, please disregard the religious references by the interviewer. Del Bigtree is a great investigative journalist, but he isn't Jesus. 🙂 As I've said many times on my site: I do not subscribe to any religious views.
I don't subscribe to the religious connotations in the video below, but it contains some important information with regard to the Simulation and now Real World scenario for the corona virus.
The corona virus that suddenly appeared in China in the Wuhan region and that is said to have started on an animal market is covered by an English patent. This is a patent number EP3172319B1developed by Erica Bickerton on it Pirbright Institute in Surrey, England. The Pirbright Institute (Bill & Melinda Gates) specializes in the study of infectious diseases in farm animals.
It is rather strange that it has been possible to conclude that the virus outbreak initiated on a market in the Chinese Wuhan region, while it is unknown from which animals. After all, one might expect that the person who brought the animals to the market should have become ill at least as well.
You would think that it shouldn't be that complicated to trace the source; unless it is a PsyOp (psychological operation and therefore a false flag). Well, if the patent belongs to this English laboratory, how do these animals end up on the Chinese market? Although it is claimed that it is probably a mutated virus, the biggest question remains how the virus ended up in China after all.
The second question that arises is how one can know that it is a mutated virus? This can only be known if blood samples are taken from infected patients and then make genetic analyses of those samples. That seems like a matter of a few hours to me with current modern research resources.
It is not that DNA mapping is still in its infancy. Science is even so far that, using the CRISP-CAS12 method, DNA can be read and modified remotely (seethis explanation). You could therefore expect that it is possible to know the exact composition and therefore the mutation characteristics of the virus. It can be assumed that it is actually quite impossible that researchers are not familiar with the exact characteristics of the virus. If a virus mutates, this means that it did have time to undergo that mutation.
Now the corona virus has been developed in the English lab based on pure genetic analysis of the disease that it should fight as a vaccine. The corona virus is built as a vaccine against bronchitis (read the patent for the explanation). This implies that either the vaccine in China must be injected to the population or a traveler has ever been given the vaccine (and others have been infected with the vaccine virus).
UPDATE 16:00 PM The corona virus appears to be a vaccine that hasspecifically been developedfor bronchitis in chickensinfectious bronchitis virus(IBV). That means that it should be specifically injected into chickens and not into humans. The question now is how the transfer to people could have taken place. A much more important question, however, is how a virus developed in a laboratory could mutate? And what is the use of vaccines anyway, if it proves to be more dangerous than the problem against which it was developed? And what happens when people eat chickens or eggs from those chickens; chickens in which a vaccine has been injected that apparently now has mutated (which is probably a psychological operation).
No matter from which position you look at it, we have to conclude that the vaccine is basically the source of infection. The fact that the virus is said to have mutated into a dangerous and deadly virus still means that it is a mutation of a (laboratory-built) vaccine virus and not a mutation of the bronchitis virus.
Is that not in itself a reason to question the development of vaccines? After all, vaccines are laboratory-built viruses that should prevent virus outbreaks of a known disease. In short: a virus that was built in a laboratory as an anti-virus (vaccine) appears to be the source of the Wuhan virus outbreak; where the vaccine virus has mutated into something dangerous.
In my opinion we are dealing here with a Psychological Operation (PsyOp) that is meant to lead to a worldwide vaccination obligation. That in itself is a very urgent issue for the UN, because the UN and the Catholic Church are the major driving forces behind the transgederization and transhumanization of mankind (hermaphrodite-cyborg humanity). And to realize that, they need everyones DNA and every boy who is born must receive a vaccine that was grown on a female aborted (animal or human) fetus and every girl must receive a vaccine that was grown on a male fetus. They also want to be able to inject an enzyme into people with which they can make genetic modification in people (online via the 5G network).
That IVF babies have probably been made hermaphrodite (both sexes) for several decades I explain in this article.In it I also explain that this ambiguity does not always have to be clearly visible in the physical appearance.
On the necessity of the enzyme that makes the CRISPR-CAS12 search and replace functionality possible (via the 5G network) I provide a detailed explanation inthis article.
A salient detail is that the inventor of the corona virus, Erica Bickerton from the Pirbright Institute, also developed a chimeric protein based on the corona virus (see here). That means that we can recognize the chimeric effect here again; the effect needed for making hermaphrodite babies, as explained in the article about IVF.
The chimeras (also called 'chimeric') effect is not a natural phenomenon. Chimerism expresses itself primarily through IVF in the form of fermal hermaphrodite development (both sexes/genitals). You could imagine that injecting a vaccine (grown on a fetus of the opposite gender of the baby) into newborn babies has the same effect on growth. So it seems that this PsyOp unmasks the agenda of transgenderism through the developer of the corona virus; because Erica Brighton is also the builder of a chimeric protein based on the same virus. Why else would you name a protine after the dual-genital effect that occurs in IVF babies?
