THRIVE I: What On Earth Will It Take is an unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what's REALLY going on in our world, by following the money upstream and uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. By weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, Thrive offers real solutions and empowers people with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming their lives and their future.
Although I’ve placed this documentary in the Science & Technology section, Thrive covers many –if not all- of the topics that can also be found in other sections on this website.
In this clip from 1971 the late and great Howard Zinndefends the importance of civil disobedience against social injustices. What's astounding is that the comments he made then, still apply to the world today.
In the video below actor Matt Damon reads an excerpt from a speech that Howard Zinn gave in 1970 as part of a debate on civil disobedience.
Agenda 21 is the comprehensive Orwellian plan for your life cooked up by tireless minions at the United Nations. Where you live, how you travel, whether you work or not, what sort of dwelling you call home – everything about your future has been decided. Science fiction? I don't think so.
In how many more ways do I need to say there is an agenda behind the corona virus. Wake up people!
This article contains links to a number of documentaries that analyze the mainstream media's broadcasts on 9/11/2001. (the links will be provided further down in the article)
The above mentioned documentaries purport that elements from the highest levels in the mainstream media, may have actively participated in the 9/11 false flag operation since, when studied in-dept and in slow motion, NONE of the footage that was broadcast live on 9/11 shows conclusive evidence of actual, physical airplanes.
I researched this subject extensively since I know that buildings cannot swallow airplanes which, according to all the news footage on that day, also happened on September 11th.
Basic high school physics dictates that the planes could not punch through the facades of the Twin Towers, leaving cartoon-like plane shaped holes in the steel framework – and without any deflection, crumpling or deceleration! Watch these 2 video clips:
As you can see the plane actually disappears into the buildingAFTERwhichthere is an explosion. Even if you only have an elementary understanding of physics, you should know that this just doesn't happen with real objects.
If the planes had been real they would have exploded up against the side of the building, not punch through one side and out the other.
I fully understand that the concept of projected/computer generated airplanes can be extremely hard to believe so check it out for yourself. If you have a 9/11 DVD at home that shows the second plane hitting the building, take it out and play it in slow motion (or pause/play alternately). If you don't have a DVD at home just find/download a video on the internet of the second plane hitting the building and you can do the same.
This is how NASA explains it to kids:
Newton's Third Law of Motion – When an object is pushed in one direction, there is always a resistance of the same size in the opposite direction. Clickhereto visit the page.
A simple experiment: take a toy plane, or any physical object for that matter, and -without hurting yourself of course- slam it into a wall as hard as you can. Does the plane/object disappear into the wall?? NO, it doesn't. If the rails of a high speed train are laid out to make the train run into a steel and concrete wall, will the train disappear into the wall? NO, it won't.
To further prove my point:
This is the "crash site" of flight United 93 on 9/11/2001.WHERE IS THE PLANE DEBRIS?
This is a picture of the Pentagon lawn on 9/11/2001, in the area where American Airlines flight 77 supposedly hit the building.WHERE IS THE PLANE DEBRIS?
Jamie McIntyre is a former senior Pentagon correspondent for CNN. He was at the Pentagon on September 11th when the “plane” supposedly hit the building.
This is Jamie McIntyre’sLIVE FEED from the Pentagon on that day. Please note that the anchor woman mentionsthat he got very close to where that "plane" went down.
In this original report McIntryre clearly states"….from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." […] "There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon."
You should know that “for some reason” he changed his report afterwards and said that not only did he see a plane but he also took pictures.
Ludicrous.
By comparison
The crash site of flight Pan Am 103 that went down in Lockerbie on December 21st, 1988.
The crash site of American Airlines 1420 that overran the runway and crashed in Little Rock National Airport on June 1st, 1999.
The crash site of Malaysian Airlines MH17 which was shot down over the Ukraine on July 17th, 2014.
On October 7th, 2012 Discovery Channel aired an episode of ‘Curiosity’, in which a Boeing 727 was deliberately crash-landed in a remote and uninhabited Mexican desert as part of a scientific experiment.
And then there is World Trade Center 7 which was NOT hit by an airplane, NOT a blazing fireball, but it nevertheless collapsed in it's own footprint on the afternoon of September 11th, 2001. This is one of the videos made by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Solving The Mystery of WTC 7.
As the saying goes: I rest my case and I challenge the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, to prove the fact that no planes were used on 9/11/2001 wrong. Based on the evidence to date (for example reports from first responders and footage shot on 9/11/2001) it looks like holographic projections were used to simulate the airplanes, but the buildings were actually destroyed by using a missile or missiles (Pentagon) and controlled demolitions (World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7).
No planes means no terrorist attack ("terrorist attack" is still the official explanation of the US government), which means that the events that took place on 9/11/2001 were executed from within the United States with a -for lack of a better term- demonic level of deception. And with all this I haven't even discussed the even more esoteric, ritualistic aspects of the 9/11 deception yet.
If it's difficult for you to believe that the global mainstream media is taking part in the cover-up of the truth about what actually happened on 9/11, I challenge you to do the following:
Call or send an email to your favorite mainstream/national television station (doesn’t matter in which country you live) and ask them to broadcast any one of the many documentaries (Loose Change, Continuous Pieces, September Clues (2008), etc., etc.) that go against the official story of 9/11.
They will not be broadcast. I guarantee.
Then ask yourself, WHY?
The answer is self-evident.
(Non-)Actions speak louder than words.
Stop watching television and think for yourself.
What you have to understand is that as the "terrorist attack" was a lie, this entire list and much, much more is based on lies too :
The formation of the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and extremely invasive airport screening. (for example Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) equipment which uses either backscatter X-ray or millimeter-wave technology to provide a graphic image of a passenger's body beneath clothing)
